پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی

پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی

اولویت‌بندی موانع توسعه اقتصادی استان ایلام با استفاده از تکنیک AHP

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم اجتماعی ، واحدتهران غرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی، واحد تهران غرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/api.2026.2089219.1753
چکیده
هدف: هدف اصلی این پژوهش، تبیین جامعه‌شناختی موانع توسعه اقتصادی در شهر ایلام بوده است تا از این طریق، شناخت دقیق‌تری از چالش‌های پیش‌روی توسعه این منطقه حاصل شود.
روش پژوهش: این مطالعه از نوع پیمایشی بوده و با بهره‌گیری از روش دلفی و تکنیک مصاحبه با متخصصان انجام شده است. جامعه آماری شامل ۲۰ نفر از خبرگان و متخصصان حوزه‌های مختلف شهر ایلام بوده که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده‌اند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های به‌دست‌آمده، از نرم‌افزار آماری SPSS استفاده شده و دیدگاه‌های متخصصان در چهار محور اقتصادی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و سیاسی دسته‌بندی گردید.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که موانع توسعه اقتصادی ایلام در چهار بخش اصلی قابل شناسایی هستند:
اقتصادی: وابستگی به درآمدهای نفتی و کمبود زیرساخت‌های صنعتی.
اجتماعی: نرخ بالای مهاجرت نیروی انسانی و ضعف سرمایه اجتماعی.
فرهنگی: نگرش سنتی به کارآفرینی و تبعیض‌های فرهنگی و قومی.
سیاسی: بوروکراسی پیچیده و ناکارآمد و کمبود شفافیت در سیاست‌های اقتصادی.
نتیجه‌گیری: موانع توسعه اقتصادی استان ایلام نیازمند توجه مستمر و اتخاذ رویکردی جامع و هماهنگ است. تنها با شناسایی دقیق و نظام‌مند این موانع و تدوین و اجرای راهکارهای عملیاتی بر اساس آن‌ها، می‌توان به بهبود شاخص‌های اقتصادی و ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در این استان دست یافت.

چکیده تصویری

اولویت‌بندی موانع توسعه اقتصادی استان ایلام با استفاده از تکنیک AHP
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identification and Prioritization of Sociological and Institutional Barriers to Rural Economic Development in Ilam Province Using the Delphi Method

نویسندگان English

Seyed GHodratollah Lavaji 1
Hassan GHanimati 2
Soroush Fathi 2
1 Department of Social Sciences, Tehran West Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to provide a sociological explanation of the barriers to economic development in the city of Ilam in order to achieve a more precise understanding of the challenges facing the region’s development.
Method: This study employed a survey-based approach and was conducted using the Delphi method and interviews with experts. The statistical population consisted of 20 experts and specialists from various fields in the city of Ilam who were selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was carried out using the SPSS statistical software, and the experts perspectives were categorized into four dimensions: economic, social, cultural, and political.
Results: The results indicated that the barriers to economic development in Ilam can be identified in four main categories:
Economic: Dependence on oil revenues and a lack of industrial infrastructure.
Social: High rates of human capital migration and weak social capital.
Cultural: Traditional attitudes toward entrepreneurship and the presence of cultural and ethnic discrimination.
Political: Complex and inefficient bureaucracy and a lack of transparency in economic policies.
Conclusion: The barriers to economic development in Ilam Province require sustained attention and the adoption of a comprehensive and coordinated approach. Only through the systematic identification of these barriers and the formulation and implementation of practical strategies based on them can improvements in economic indicators and the quality of life in the province be achieved.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Development
Economic Development
Barriers to Economic Development
City of Ilam
Ahmed, S. M. (2024). Community participation and institutional capacity in rural development planning. Land Use Policy, 138(3), 466–482. 
Allison, S., & Sankaran, S. (2022). Governing rural spaces: Local institutions, collective action, and sustainable development. Land Use Policy, 118, 378–396. 
Baral, S. (2023). Institutional effectiveness and social cohesion in shaping rural sustainability pathways. Community Development Journal, 58(3), 451–468. 
Bourdieu, P. (2019). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press. 
Chambers, R. (2022). Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Longman. 
Chen, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). Education inequality and rural social development: Evidence from developing regions. International Journal of Educational Development, 102(4), 102901, 1–12. 
Coleman, J. S. (2021). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
Dall’erba, S. (2022). Institutions and regional economic growth: The role of governance quality. Journal of Economic Geography, 98(4), 357–381. 
Darwari, S. Z., Jamshidi, O., & Pir Alidehi, F. (2025). Identification and analysis of obstacles and solutions for the development of sustainable entrepreneurship in coastal villages. Local Development (Rural–Urban), 17(2), 405–426. 
De Luca, G., & Faggian, A. (2023). Social capital and rural innovation: Exploring spatial disparities in community resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 100, 210–223. 
Field, J. (2023). Social capital (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. 
Garcia, M., & Martinez, P. (2024). Empowering rural communities through local governance and collective action. Sustainability, 16(5), 2147–2161. 
Garcia, M., & Navarro, F. (2024). Towards a framework for understanding regional rural development. Regional Studies, 58(7), 1423–1437. 
Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2023). Measuring social capital and its impact on economic development. Social Indicators Research, 170(1), 89–110. 
Harrington, L., & Paxton, P. (2024). Trust, civic engagement, and the dynamics of social capital in small communities. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(5), 734–751. 
Hosseini Kohnouj, S., & Sejasi Qeydari, H. (2025). Identification and analysis of challenges and drivers of development and commercialization of rural knowledge‑based businesses using the fuzzy Delphi method. Rural Research, 16(2), 141–161. 
Khan, H., & Khan, A. (2024). Institutional governance and rural development outcomes: Evidence from community‑based programs. Sustainability, 16(4), 1589–1604. 
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2022). Multi‑dimensional perspectives on rural development: Governance, social structures, and spatial transformations. Land Use Policy, 126, 689–708. 
Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2023). Strengthening local institutions for participatory rural development: Lessons from community‑based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 104(1), 210–221. 
Kobayashi, K. (2022). Social capital and sustainable rural development: A global comparative analysis. Sustainability, 14(4), 2391–2406.
Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2025). Rethinking rural development research: Gaps, frameworks, and emerging directions (2010–2025). World Development, 178(3), 106512, 1–14. 
Liu, Y. (2024). Social cohesion, institutional capacity, and rural development outcomes. Land Use Policy, 139, 221–239. 
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2024). Community‑driven development and local participation: Evidence from rural development programs. World Development, 176(2), 631–652. 
Mohammadi, S. (2025). Analysis of barriers to the development of rural women’s entrepreneurship in confronting unfavorable entrepreneurial environment conditions (Case study: Villages of Marivan County). Rural Research, 16(3), 1–24.
Nyumba, T., & Adjei, P. (2024). Institutional effectiveness, local participation, and rural sustainability outcomes in Sub‑Saharan Africa. Development in Practice, 34(2), 245–259. 
Oakley, P. (2022). Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labour Office. 
Ostrom, E. (2023). Social capital and collective action in community‑based resource management. World Development, 167, 496–513. 
Pretty, J. (2021). Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and self‑reliance. London: Earthscan. 
Putnam, R. D. (2020). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. 
Rahman, T., & Ahnaf, C. (2025). Socio‑economic dynamics and development challenges in rural Bangladesh: A case study of Brahmapur village. Rural Development Studies, 17(2), 115–132. 
Rodriguez‑Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2023). Institutional change and regional development in rural areas. Regional Studies, 57(5), 812–826. 
Santos, M., & Rodriguez, C. (2023). Community networks, collective action, and rural innovation. Development Studies, 59*(8), 1432–1448. 
Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2024). Rural development strategies: Rethinking planning approaches in rural regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 104(1), 45–60. 
Solaymanfal, S., Hajipour, M., & Heydari, S. (2025). Analysis of skill requirements for agricultural development and barriers to its education: A case study of rural areas of Faryab County. Geography and Development, 23(78), 209–244. 
Turner, S., & Hume, D. (2022). Governance, administration and development: Making the state work. Hartford: Kumarian Press. 
Uphoff, N. (2019). Local institutional development: An analytical sourcebook with cases. West Hartford: Kumarian Press. 
Westlund, H. (2023). Institutional capacity and rural development: Evidence from regional governance reforms. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 180–199. 
Williams, C. C. (2023). Informal institutions and entrepreneurship in rural economies. Development Studies, 59(6), 1072–1089. 
Zhao, P., & Liu, Y. (2024). Governance, institutions, and rural transformation in developing economies. Land Use Policy, 138, 157–172.