New researches in Islamic humanities studies

New researches in Islamic humanities studies

The Impact of the Death or Lifting of Legal Incapacity of the Incapacitated Tortfeasor on the Compensation of Damages to the Injured Party: A Comparative Analysis in Iranian and English Law

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Private Law, Department of Law, Yasuj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Yasuj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Yasuj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj, Iran
10.22034/api.2026.2081212.1610
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a comparative study of the impact of the death or restoration of capacity (removal from guardianship) of a tortfeasor on compensation for the injured party in Iranian and English law, and to analyze how liability for compensation is transferred to the guardian, the estate, or the individual formerly under guardianship within these two legal systems.
Method: An analytical-comparative approach, involving the study of statutory laws, legal doctrines, and judicial precedents in Iranian law (specifically Article 1216 of the Civil Code and Article 7 of the Tort Liability Law) and English law (based on the principles of negligence-based liability).
Results: In Iranian law, liability for damage caused by the tortious act of a person under guardianship primarily rests with the guardian or legal tutor, contingent upon proof of the guardian's fault. Upon the death of the ward, the claim can be pursued against their estate or the guardian. If the ward's capacity is restored, the formerly incapacitated individual becomes personally liable for compensation. In English law, tort claims are founded on negligence. Upon the tortfeasor's death, the claim continues against their estate. If the individual's mental capacity is restored, the claim is directed against the person themselves.
Conclusions: In both legal systems, the death or restoration of a tortfeasor's capacity does not result in the extinguishment of liability for compensation; however, the manner in which liability is allocated differs. In Iranian law, the guardian's role in liability is more pronounced, whereas English law emphasizes the estate of the deceased or the individual who has regained capacity. The development of clearer legislation and the utilization of insurance mechanisms could provide more effective protection for both the injured party and incapacitated individuals.
Keywords
Subjects

کاتوزیان، ناصر ، (1388). حقوق مدنی: قواعد عمومی قراردادها (جلد دوم).شرکت سهامی انتشار.
 کاتوزیان، ناصر ، (1390). حقوق مدنی: قواعد عمومی قراردادها (جلد اول). شرکت سهامی انتشار.
کاتوزیان، ناصر ، (1392). حقوق مدنی: مسئولیت مدنی. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
محقق داماد، مصطفی، (1390). قواعد فقه (چاپ سوم). مرکز نشر علوم اسلامی.
نجفی، محمد حسین، (1367). جواهر الکلام فی شرح شرایع الإسلام (جلد ۴۳). دار الکتب الإسلامیه.
رجبی، مهدی و حاجی‌ده‌آبادی، محمدعلی، (1396)، خسارت معنوی و شیوه‌های جبران آن با تأکید بر رویه قضایی ایران. تهران، کنفرانس سالانه پژوهش در علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی.
صفایی، حسین و رحیمی، ح. (1398). مسئولیت مدنی (چاپ پنجم). انتشارات سمت.
شهیدی، مهدی، (1389). حقوق مدنی: مسئولیت مدنی (چاپ دوم). انتشارات مجد.
 
Ashton, G., Duce, B., & Letts, P. (2016). Court of Protection Handbook: A Practical Guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (2nd ed.). Legal Action Group.
Bartlett, P. (2012). Mental Disability and the Law. Oxford University Press.
Cretney, S. M. (2005). Principles of Family Law (7th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Deakin, S., Johnston, A., & Markesinis, B. (2020). Markesinis and Deakin's Tort Law (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Herring, J. (2018). Medical Law and Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Katouzian, N. (2009). Hoquq-e madani: Qava'ed-e 'omumi-ye qarardadha [Civil law: General rules of contracts] (Vol. 2). Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Enteshar.
Katouzian, N. (2011). Hoquq-e madani: Qava'ed-e 'omumi-ye qarardadha [Civil law: General rules of contracts] (Vol. 1). Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Enteshar.
Katouzian, N. (2013). Hoquq-e madani: Mas'uliyyat-e madani [Civil law: Civil liability]. Entesharat-e Daneshgah-e Tehran.
Mohaghegh Damad, M. (2011). Qava'ed-e feqh [Rules of jurisprudence] (3rd ed.). Markaz-e Nashr-e 'Olum-e Eslami.
Najafi, M. H. (1988). Jawaher al-kalam fi sharh shara'i' al-Islam (Vol. 43). Dar al-Kotob al-Islamiyyah.
Rajabi, M., & Haji Dehabadi, M. A. (2017). Khasarat-e ma'navi va shiveh-haye jebran-e an ba ta'kid bar raveh-ye qaza'i-ye Iran [Moral damages and methods of compensation with emphasis on Iranian judicial procedure]. Konferans-e Salaneh-ye Pajuhesh dar 'Olum-e Ensani va Motale'at-e Ejtema'i [Annual Conference on Research in Humanities and Social Studies]. Tehran, Iran.
Safaei, H., & Rahimi, H. (2019). Mas'uliyyat-e madani [Civil liability] (5th ed.). Entesharat-e Samt.
Shahidi, M. (2010). Hoquq-e madani: Mas'uliyyat-e madani [Civil law: Civil liability] (2nd ed.). Entesharat-e Majd.