New researches in Islamic humanities studies

New researches in Islamic humanities studies

An analytical-descriptive reading of modern administrative law with a look at the foundations and principles of classical administrative law

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Abstract
Purpose  :This article examines the evolution and key characteristics of administrative law in its classical and modern forms. It analyzes the role of administrative law in structuring government operations, regulating state-citizen relations, and the influence of social, economic, and technological advancements on this legal discipline. 
 Research Method : Using an analytical-descriptive approach, this study compares classical and modern administrative law by reviewing library resources, legal texts, and historical developments. The analysis focuses on the defining features of both systems and their implications for governance and public administration. 
 Findings: 
- Classical administrative law emphasizes state sovereignty, separation of powers, judicial review, and the growth of administrative institutions, remaining a cornerstone of governance. 
- Modern administrative law has emerged in response to socioeconomic and political transformations, enhancing governmental efficiency through new institutions and technological integration. 
- While both systems aim to regulate state-citizen relations and safeguard individual and collective rights, modern administrative law demonstrates greater adaptability to societal needs. 
 Conclusion : Administrative law persists as a fundamental pillar of governance in both classical and modern forms. Whereas classical administrative law adheres to traditional frameworks and judicial oversight, its modern counterpart embraces innovation to improve efficiency and responsiveness. These developments underscore the necessity for administrative law to evolve dynamically, aligning with societal and technological changes to effectively fulfill its regulatory and governance objectives. 
Keywords
Subjects

  1. امامی، محمد، کورش، سنگری(1392) حقوق اداری، تهران، نشر میزان
  2. جعفری لنگرودی، محمد جعفر( 1386) ترمنولوژی حقوق، تهران، انتشارات گنج دانش
  3. فروزنده دهکردی، لطف الله (1387)، بررسی نقش تئوری های نوین مدیریت در قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری، نشریه علمی مدیریت فردا، شماره 19، 21-33
  4. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1396). ، مبانی حقوق عمومی، تهران: نشر میزان
  5. جوانمرد، لیلا ،(1403) شرایط ایجاد سرقفلی و حق کسب در حقوق ایران با مطالعه ی تطبیقی در حقوق انگلیس و فرانسه، نشریه پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی، دوره 3، شماره 5 شماره پیاپی 5، صفحه 103-119/

10.22034/API.2024.2040733.1051

  1. .منتسکیو (1398)، روح‌القوانین، ترجمه: علی اکبر مهتدی، تهران: نشر امیر کبیر
  2. موسوی زاده، ابراهیم( 1393) حقوق اداری، تهران، نشر دادگستر
  3. محمودی، میرزایی، حسین، داوود، (1403) نقش نهاد تصفیه ورشکستگی در تامین امنیت روانی جامعه، نشریه پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی، دوره 3، شماره 5 شماره پیاپی 5، صفحه 103-119/ 22034/API.2024.2040620.1050
  4. William F. Fox,(2000) understanding administrative law, fourth edition ,Legal text series
  5. Schaffer, A. (2017). Administrative Law: A Comparative Approach. Oxford University Press
  6. Stone, C. (2020). The New Public Administration. Routledge.
  7. Mashiri, M. (2015). "Modern Administrative Law and Accountability: The shift from Bureaucratic to Participatory Governance," Journal of Public Law, 42(3), 564-582.
  8. Clarke, T., & Lee, D. (2018). "Administrative Law in Modern Democracies," Harvard Law Review, 130(1), 75-98
  9. Barnes,Javier (2010) , towards a third generation of administrative procedures in Comparative Administrative Law, Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth Published by Edward Elgar.Publishing Limited.
  10. Cassese,sabino, (2003) New paths for administrative law: A manifesto», International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume10, Issue 3, July 2012: 603
  11. Aman Jr. Alfred c. «Globalization, Democracy, and the Need for a New dministrative Law», Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1
  12. Hood, Christopher and Dixon, Ruth (2015), a government that worked better and cost less?,oxford university