پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی

پژوهش های نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی اسلامی

ارتقای اصل قانونی بودن حقوق کیفری در رویه قضایی دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
10.22034/api.2024.2028865.1023
چکیده
اصل قانونمندی حقوق کیفری بعنوان یکی از فراگیرترین اصول پذیرفته شده در حقوق کیفری و قوانین ملی در عصر حاضر، در عرصه فراملی نیز از همان صلابت برخوردار است. یکی از مهمترین نهادهای حقوقی – قضایی فراملی، دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر است که در چارچوب کنوانسیون اروپایی حقوق بشر فعالیت می کند. دیوان به منظور تامین و حفظ حقوق بشر و در راستای تحکیم حاکمیت قانون از یک سو، و تضمین تشریفات دادرسی منصفانه از سوی دیگر، با بازاندیشی در اصل قانونی بودن، بسیاری از ابهامات و استثنائات خلاف حقوق بشری پیش روی اصل را زدوده است. دیوان با تجدیدنظر در عناصر مقوم اصل قانونی بودن حقوق کیفری، عملاً مفهوم این اصل اساسی را در قلمروی قانون، جرم، و مجازات، از نظر کیفی ارتقا بخشیده است. در این مقاله ضمن بررسی رویه قضایی دیوان و با ابتنا بر مهمترین آرا و نیز  با تاکید بر مواد 6 و 7 کنوانسیون، توسعه مفهومی اصل قانونمندی در بستر باز اندیشی در مفاهیم قانون، جرم و مجازات در رویه قضایی دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر استنباط شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Promoting the principle of legality of criminal law in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

نویسنده English

Hamed Rahdadpour
Department of Law, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده English

The principle of legality of criminal law, as one of the most widely accepted principles in criminal law and national laws in the present era, also enjoys the same strength in the transnational arena. One of the most important supranational legal-judicial institutions is the European Court of Human Rights, which operates within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights. In order to ensure and protect human rights and to strengthen the rule of law on the one hand, and to ensure fair trial procedures on the other, the Court has, by rethinking the principle of legality, removed many ambiguities and exceptions that violate human rights before the principle. By revising the constituent elements of the principle of legality of criminal law, the Court has practically qualitatively upgraded the concept of this fundamental principle in the realm of law, crime, and punishment. In this article, while examining the jurisprudence of the Court and based on the most important opinions and also emphasizing Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention, the conceptual development of the principle of legality has been deduced in the context of rethinking the concepts of law, crime, and punishment in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Principle of legality
European Court of Human Rights
Judicial procedure
Law
Crime
Punishment
-1 Akther, Shajeda, and Nordin, Rohaida,(2014), Equality of arms: A Fundamental Principle of Fair Trail Guarantee Developed by International and Regional Human Rights Instrument, Legal Network Sciences.
- 2Artin, S,( 2005), Nulla Poena Sine Lege in comparative perspective : retrospectively under the ECHR and US constitution, spring PL, 107-131
- 3Beddard, R, (1996), The rights of the criminal under Article 7 ECHR,. EL.Rev supp, human Rights Survey, 3-13
- 4CTIF, (Counter Terrorism Implementation Task Force), (2014), Basic Human Rights Reference Guide, Right to a Fair Trial and Due Process in the Context of Countering Terrorism, CTITF Publications.
- 5Donald, Alice and Gordon, Jane and Leach, Philip, (2012), The UK and the European Court of Human Rights and Social Justice Research Institute, London Metropolitan University.
- 6Feeley, M, and  Simon, J, ( 1994), Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law, in D.Nelkin, The future of criminology, London, sage, 173-201
- 7Greer, Steven Crawford, (2006), The European convention on human rights: Achievements, problems and prospects, Cambridge University Press.
- 8Guide on article 7 of the convention, (2017),  No punishment without law: the principle that only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty, European Court of Human Rights.
- 9Jean- Francois, Renucci, (2005), Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights, the Rights Guaranteed and the Protection Mechanism, Council of Europe Publishing.
- 10Lautenbach, Geranne, (2013), The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
- 11Letsas, George, (2004), The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR, EJIL , vol 15, no 2, 279- 305
- 12Mahoney, Paul, (2004), Right To A Fair Trial In Criminal Matters Under Article 6 E.C.H.R., Judicial Studies Institute Journal, vol 4, no 2, 107 – 129
- 13Nicola Lupo & Giovanni Piccirilli,(2012 ), European Court of Human Rights and the Quality of Legislation: Shifting to a Substantial Concept of ‘Law’?, Legisprudence, Volume 6, Issue 2
- 14Robinson, William, (2014 ), Making EU Legislation Clearer, European Journal of Law Reform (16) 3
- 15Zhang; Jixi, Liang, Xiaohua, (2010), The Scope of Application of Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Matters - Comparing ICCPR with Chinese Law, Art and Social Science Journal, Volume.